Environmental portraiture has always been a popular genre of photography. It can establish the time or place that the image was taken, giving the viewer an insight into the context behind the image. When you view a portrait you automatically begin to look for clues that indicates who they are as a person. But these clues are often found past the main focus of the model. The location, whether it is natural or man made can give so much more information. Objects in the scene can also be useful. All these things are what make up an ‘environmental portrait’. In all genres of photography, the location is one of the most important aspects of the image. I learnt this myself in the set construction module, every object we put in the frame added to the context and story of the photograph. So even if it is subconsciously, the items in a scene in an environmental portrait has great significance.

As Jaqueline Tobin says in a book, it is always tempting to get close to the subject to show the expression and facial details but taking a step back can tell more of a story. What makes environmental portraits so effective is that they are more accurate representations of reality. For example if you’re photographing someone in their room, they can put on certain clothes, put on makeup and pose in a certain way but the location doesn’t change. Even if the subject wasn’t in the frame, the room can probably give more indication about who they are as a person.
Another important part of the environment is the way the subject interacts in it. Using my work as an example, the subject is going to be so much more comfortable in their own space. This is something I have noticed in my own practice. I often photograph the same people. If I take them to a different location, they act is a different way to when they are somewhere they know. Looking back at the way the relationship between the photographer and subject affects how the viewer sees the image, the relationship between subject and location is just as important. I want the subject to feel comfortable so that they have a more relaxed, natural expression.
So to conclude, environmental portraits can be more effective than any other. If you took a photo of someone that ran a shop in their shop, the viewer would have so much understanding about who they and what they do. Whereas if you put the person in a studio with no props they become almost anonymous. There is no clues to give the viewer any ideas on the story of the subject. Each environmental portrait has its own narrative, which can make it so much more interesting than a studio portrait.










































































